What good is new health care when Global warming is going to wipe out most people anyway?
Joe asked:
According the liberal facts on Global warming. Shouldn’t Obama be pitching trillions for stopping Global warming 1st? What’s the point of getting someone life saving surgery when the planet is going to be a disaster?
According the liberal facts on Global warming. Shouldn’t Obama be pitching trillions for stopping Global warming 1st? What’s the point of getting someone life saving surgery when the planet is going to be a disaster?
Share This Post
We will still need health care while living in boats.
LOL…exactly we should be digging down deep to buy carbon credits from Gore. For the love.
God Bless America
The ” health care ” legislation is to prevent costly life saving surgery. “maybe instead you can just take a pain killer” B.O.
Fatalists, geez.
The sun is going to go nova too, so let’s all just slit our wrists.
If that is the argument we should just stop doing everything.
By making people well and able to work, then there is more money freed up to deal with climate change because of less money being diverted to welfare for people who can’t work because they are sick. And they are sick because HMO ask for tonnes of money for inadequate care.
Sure, Joe. Let’s throw trillions at climate change and new energy technologies that get us off oil and carbon. Sounds awesome. Cool?
Cap and tax will slow global warming.
Of course, it will also cause millions to lose their jobs, but hey, they’ll breath easier riding their bikes to the unemployment line.
you may have a point , but i think i would have afordable health care until that happens which might take another 100 years.
Holy Cow!
I am a planet killer! I drive a gas guzzling, ozone depleting, ice cap melting, fume belching big frigging truck. Blame me.
he figures it will take 1 million or so years to get that hot so why not control our lives now
Give it up man. Back in the ’60’s the eco-freakos were saying we’d all be dead of pollution by now. Didn’t exactly work out the way they expected, you know? So I, for one, don’t expect them to be any more accurate now! Where I live (Southern Illinois) we’re coming off the coolest summer in my memory (and I’m 57). I ran my a/c two weeks in June, and not at all in July or August. Global warming my @ss! We’re probably headed for another ice age!
That’s like asking, “What good are Neo-Natzis when we have Republicans?”
Spend trillions on stopping global warming? Wow. You have no real concern for humanity do you?
First, let’s debunk MANMADE global warming or climate change, whatever it’s being called this hour.
Gore’s computer models predicted that after 1997 the temperature would forever rise on an even keel. Since 1998 the planet has been cooling, while we have seen an increase in that ordorless, colorless, non-toxic, naturally occuring, trace gas Carbon Dioxide.
CO2 levels have risen, the temperature has fallen. Theory of CO2 driving climate is WRONG. END OF STORY.
Now for the 11 billion that has been spent of research and green technology to combat a fictional modern day orson welles martian attack, shouldn’t it be spent on people instead?
My God, we still have people in third world countries that have no potable water, food shortages, inadequate medical treatments, no educational system and lack of proper shelter.
And you wan to spend “trillions” of dollars in hopes of keeping the temperature from rising a few degrees.
The planet has been warmer than it is today in the recent past. A scientific consensus does not equate scientific fact. Consensus is a political word, not scientific.
Those who make the statement “the science is settled” are sure to have a short life. Science is never settled and nature is ALWAYS changing and evolving.
I say we spend the “trillions” of dollars on HUMAN BEINGS LIVING WORSE THAN OUR HOUSEPETS, than on an attempt at another martian attack.
Jonathan Swift once said “It is a useless thing to reason a man out of a thing he never reasoned into”.